Escherian Tilings

Just spent a week teaching a course on Escherian tilings at Universidade Aberta (the Portuguese analogue of the Open University). This is a tiling I made as a demo for the students. It is a deformation of a regular triangular tiling of the plane.

a womb full of guillotines

Art as therapy?

Art as a molotov cocktail. Art as a flame thrower. Art as a knife wound. Art as a womb full of guillotines, ready to give birth. Art as a curse upon the halls of impunity, to hound them for a thousand years. Anthony took the hands of Cicero, but still they strangle the neck of his memory, and Cesena still burns in the hell Michelangelo painted for him.

They must learn to fear Art again.

On the ongoing occupation of Wall Street

Regarding the criticism that "the movement hasn't got a well-defined, clear message":

Direct action is the message. The discomfort for the people in charge is the message. The formulation of clearly stated objectives (hard in a truly spontaneous movement) is not as important as the creation of hardship and discomfort to the people in charge. The single message is: you have made our lives hell, we will make your lives uncomfortable until *you* figure out what needs to be done to make us happy enough to stop.


Discussion here:

http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2011/10/paul-krugman-confronting-the-malefactors.html#comments

The one who got away

Today I went on the subway without my pad. Three crumpled white sheets had to make do instead. A whole parade of interesting characters were riding today - a very stern man who could be a marble bust, a couple of punk girls (one with blue hair), and two very opposite extremes, one with very wide mouth, the other with a long thin skull. I am happy with my catch.

I lost the very most interesting portrait, though. A girl with the most amusing and singularly warm expression. I couldn't get a proper angle, at first, and then when I was about to start, my station arrived. I would have proceeded where I not so damned british about keeping a schedule. For shame! I really wanted that portrait done!... Better luck next time, I hope...

Urban Sketchers Symposium and Sketchcrawl

This year's urban sketchers symposium happened in Lisbon. After the conferences and workshops, we went out to our usual sketchcrawl, only this time we filled our spot (Praça do Comercio) to the rim with a far more numerous and international crowd than we usually get...

More drawings at the usual place, of course.

Examination season

Atlas Relieved

A couple of friends had a paper coming out (on game theory) and I got asked to contribute an illustration. The paper has to do with the tragedy of the commons and how to elicit cooperation while facing the possibility of a common catastrophic risk. The drawing I came up with is loosely based on the style of the ancient Greek vases, and depicts old Atlas getting some help from a few enlightened mortals. The dice are an obvious reference to probability and risk, and the graph on the bottom left comes straight from the paper itself. There is very little acuracy intended on the world map - geography was sacrificed to design and the deadline - a hecatomb, if you will, to Chronos and the Muses :)

The drawing was used as an illustration to the paper's press release.  

As for materials, it is pure digital (no pencil preliminaries), hand-drawn with a wacom pen on the screen of my more-or-less-trusty HP pavillion tx2000.

Refrescos no Largo Camões (Refreshments at Camões square)

Another drawing from the refreshments stand at Camões square.

Outro desenho do quiosque de refrescos no largo Camões.

Pessoa no Largo Camões

(um desenho que fiz em tempos para uma competição do quiosque de refrescos)

Crimes and misdeweiners

On the irrelevance of a congressman's misdeWeiner:

Congressmen, senators, and presidents are routinely in bed with banksters, wall streeters, and lobyists of all sorts - and this corruption is the new normal - but let them try to get some actual sex - real or virtual!- and they are doomed to disgrace: theirs is the maoist ritual of weeping public apology and humiliation, followed by "treatment" (for what? having a libido? - and is "treatment" the new word for "reeducation"?). The new model politician seems to be the robber monk. By all means, people, keep worrying where congressmen stick their weiners while ignoring their hands stuck deeply in your pockets.

O golfe lidera a desobediência civil!

Já se sabia que as empresas de golfe queriam ter uma taxa de IVA especial de 6%. O que não se sabia é que essas empresas recusam-se a pagar a taxa actual, e pagam aquela que querem ver instituída. Ou seja, a taxa legal é de 23%, mas eles pagam 6% na mesma. Sim, só porque lhes apetece. O DN, como já é habitual, prefere usar o eufemismo: Golfe teima em pagar 6%. Se fosse eu a "teimar" pagar uma taxa inferior á legal, chamava-se a isso fraude fiscal, mas para os senhores do golfe é apenas teimosia. Da mesma forma que um pobre é louco e um rico é excêntrico, ao crime dos ricos chama-se teimosia.

Ou não? Será isto a aristocracia a liderar a desobediência civil.? A dar o exemplo à revolta popular? Sigamos então o nobre exemplo. Recusemo-nos a pagar qualquer IVA a mais de 6%, e, em espírito de desobediência civil, ocupemos os clubes de golfe (que certamente serão solidários à causa): espetamos as tendas no meio dos greens, fazemos as nossas latrinas nas armadilhas de areia, e tomamos os nossos banhos nos lagos. E se nos disserem para sair...teimamos em ficar.

Nostalgia

Iceland's big thaw - Learning from the Vikings

“Everyone was working for the banks — from the physicists to the philosophers,” one Icelander told me. I met two women in their mid-20s who said that when they graduated from college, virtually all of their classmates were jockeying to get into finance (...)

When money was easy, he said, “innovation was at a minimum in the country.” The prevailing sense was that it was a waste of time to invent things yourself when you could just “buy innovation from someone else.” The boom, Gudjonsson concluded, “made us lazy thinkers.”(...)

(...)when Iceland’s economy hit rock bottom, and the entire country was seized by panic — was also his son’s 16th birthday. “I went up to my boy, and I had already congratulated him on his birthday, but then I said, ‘Congratulations, you will now be able to live in a society which is closer to realizing what it is.’ ” I pressed Grimsson, asking why exactly he was so happy for his son. “After this,” Grimsson replied, “he had a much better chance of growing up to be a real person instead of a vapid airhead.”

Iceland's big thaw - (NYT)

We can learn from these Vikings. For years now we have a lamentable brain drain going on. A whole generation of physicists turned quants, earning a living through ruinous voodoo mathematics; literature majors in outbound sweatshops selling fraudulent investments; philosophy majors speculating in real estate - a whole people eagerly emulating a certain presidential candidate with a dead hamster on his head and another inside it. At an even more insidious level, those who nominally remain in creative professions feel obliged to spend a lot of their time nursing stock portfolios and worrying about market strategies (guilty as charged). How can you not? As everyone does it, you feel you must do it just to stay in the same place! Now that finance is a byword, Icelanders have a chance of putting their creative brains to use. Meanwhile,  in the EU and the USA, it is still in finance, the stock market and the banks that we stupidly set our hopes. Perhaps we need The Big One to come and hit us sooner rather than later.

Gibbon

"(...) But its fall was announced by a clearer omen than the flight of vultures: the Roman government appeared every day less formidable to its enemies, more odious and oppressive to its subjects. The taxes were multiplied with the public distress; economy was neglected in proportion as it became necessary; and the injustice of the rich shifted the unequal burden from themselves to the people, whom they defrauded of the indulgences that might sometimes have alleviated their misery. (...)The severe inquisition which confiscated their goods, and tortured their persons, compelled the subjects of Valentinian to prefer the more simple tyranny of the Barbarians (...) They abjured and abhorred the name of Roman citizens, which had formerly excited the ambition of mankind (...) and the Imperial ministers pursued with proscriptive laws, and ineffectual arms, the rebels whom they had made. If all the Barbarian conquerors had been annihilated in the same hour, their total destruction would not have restored the empire of the West: and if Rome still survived, she survived the loss of freedom, of virtue, and of honor."


-E. Gibbon, The decline and fall of the Roman Empire

The Great Firewall of Europe

Again, Europe must compete with China, this time on internet censorship. I'm sure we'll do well on that front.

The new world order seems best illustrated by the wholesome image of comrade Mao french-kissing Mr. Rockefeller. Most assuredly their puppies will be lovely.

More Samba in Alfama

Sodansusamba, Sodansusamba....

While C. and I sat at one of those cosy, minuscule bars in Lisbon's Alfama, these two characters (she brasilian, he Portuguese) sat down and filled the room with beautiful brasilian music, free of charge, to an enraptured audience. "Was that too loud?" - the guitarist asked the black barkeep after a more enthusiastic moment, to which she smiled a "no, that's fine", and joined in around the players. So much talent to go around, why do we need to fly the same packaged performer-millionaires around the world so we can pay small fortunes to be packed like devoted rats into stadiums and have our eardrums ruptured by canned music?  

Antidote

I'm becoming too grumpy. This blog needs some drawings urgently.

You are gonna be screwed. In compensation, I am gonna screw you.

Portuguese journalism at its best: You are going to be screwed, but don't worry: in compensation, I am going to do the some screwing.

Specifically: The anual tax for having a home will go up. In compensation (according to how the DN newspaper uses the word), the one-time tax for buying a home will go down. Meaning: The state will squeeze you out of your home, and in compensation it will make it cheaper for the guy who takes your home from you when you are desperate enough to sell for peanuts.

The IMF/EC/ECB wants more renting and less owning. But wait, if a house is rented, it still has an owner. What they mean is that the owner won't be you.

Let's use the word compensation in a sentence, kids:

The VAT over milk is going up. In compensation, the VAT over golf courses is going down. (True story!)

In the mother tongue:

Segundo o DN, O IMI (o imposto que pagamos por ter uma casa) vai aumentar, mas está tudo bem porque
"esta subida vai ser compensada com uma diminuição do imposto sobre as transacções onerosas sobre imóveis (IMT), antiga sisa, pago pelos contribuintes no acto de compra da casa."
Isto não é a minha especialidade, alguém corrija a minha ignorância se for o caso, mas parece-me que:
Sendo que o IMT é um imposto sobre as transacções de imóveis, pago pelo comprador, parece-me difícil que "compense" alguma coisa à típica família que todos os meses vai pagando o seu empréstimo, e que, anualmente, vai pagando um IMI agora mais elevado.

Talvez "compense", no entanto, os especuladores que nos próximos tempos achem por bem adquirir imóveis vendidos ao desbarato por essas mesmas famílias? As medidas acordadas pela "troika" pretendem desincentivar a compra de casa e incentivar o aluguer. Tudo muito razoável, mas pensando bem, se há casas para alugar, alguém será dono delas. Parece-me bem que o novo jogo é cada vez termos menos donos, cada um deles com mais casas. Talvez por isso seja adequado aumentar o IMI (e em simultâneo retirar os benefícios fiscais) para espremer os actuais donos, ao mesmo tempo que reduzimos o imposto que os novos compradores terão que pagar para recolher o "sumo" dos espremidos.

É um exemplo de "tu vais perder, mas não te preocupes: em compensação, eu vou ganhar".

Outro exemplo icónico desta definição da palavra:

O IVA sobre o leite vai subir, mas esta subida vai ser compensada pela descida do IVA sobre os clubes de Golf.

ps: Actualmente existe uma isenção de IMT para quem compre um prédio para revenda no prazo de três anos, o que já favorecia os especuladores, daí que me pareça que o propósito desta medida será facilitar a vida a quem pretenda adquirir imóveis para fins mais pemanentes. Following the money, smells like a concentration of rentiers.

Get your cadmium rice while it's hot

"We must compete with China!" - is the mantra that justifies all.

You want to get payed for overtime? WE MUST COMPETE WITH CHINA!

Vacations? CHINA!

Healthcare?? CHINA!!

Minimum wage??? CHINA!!!!

In this spirit, I impatiently inquire when I may expect the arrival of our recycled buns, paraffin eggs, cadmium rice, boraxed pork, and generally poisoned food. 

You want food that won't kill you? Are you insane? WE MUST COMPETE WITH CHINA!

Never Enough

"In 2007, the top 1 percent of all income earners in the United States made 23.5 percent of all income -- more than the bottom 50 percent. Not enough! The percentage of income going to the top 1 percent nearly tripled since the mid-1970s. Not enough! Eighty percent of all new income earned from 1980 to 2005 has gone to the top 1 percent. Not enough! The top 1 percent now owns more wealth than the bottom 90 percent. Not enough! The Wall Street executives with their obscene compensation packages now earn more than they did before we bailed them out. Not enough! With the middle class collapsing and the rich getting much richer, the United States now has, by far, the most unequal distribution of income and wealth of any major country on earth. Not enough!"


-Sen. Bernie Sanders, Huffington Post

Time to be agressively irresponsible

If  I owe 100 thousands to the bank, I am in trouble. If I owe 100 billions, the bank is in trouble.

First, this is not a moral tale, no matter what German rethoric would have us believe. Both the lenders and borrowers have been irresponsible, yet the burden is all put on the latter, with the former expecting a profit. Portugal is not being bailed out. Portugal is being forced to bail out German banks.

But what can we do, our leaders say? We have no choice but to submit!

What we can do is use our weakness as a strength. Put the gun to our own heads. Demand actual help from the ECB, or else... or else we will default, and start a process that brings down first Spain, then the whole EU (and the country that matters, Germany), right along with us. We need and we can hold the EU hostage. What we need is to elect a political force from outside of the usual circle of "responsible" parties; someone that can be "credibly irresponsible". That is why I am voting for the communists in the coming election. Not because I am a communist, but because we need someone that scares the shit out of Merkel and Trichet.

Why are we, instead of using the cards we have, begging for IMF loans at the price of our independence and our future, to ensure smooth sailing for German banks? There are only three possible answers: either our politicians are ignorant of our strenght, or too cowardly to use it, or...their interests are simply not aligned with our own.

All three are probably true in some measure, but the last one is the most important: the austerity measures, the destruction of the social state, are not their concessions to the necessity of the crisis. Rather, the crisis is the excuse to replace the social state by the society they want: not "free market", which they mock, but rather a guilded age of crony capitalism, with monopolists in charge of the market and an incestuous poltical class that ignores us all as rabble. Sadly, we are back to the fights of 100 years ago. Happily, just like 100 years ago, we do not have to stay defeated.

It is time to be agressively irresponsible.

Intrepid Germany to the rescue of Intrepid Germany

From the "Like, Duh-uh" department at The Economist

Is Germany bailing out euro-area countries to save its own banks? (no, it's the puppies and rainbows)

If the euro zone were an old-fashioned family, Germany would be the stern father telling his wayward children to go to bed early and not to spend all their pocket money at once. It has resisted efforts to ease the conditions attached to the bail-outs of Greece and Ireland, and is insisting that Portugal (...) also gets licked into shape

Sovereign defaults would entail much more than just a haircut on German banks’ government-bond exposures. It could easily lead to a slew of bank defaults—and corporate ones, too. German banks are owed twice as much by banks in the three bailed-out countries as they are by governments. 

(...)compared with the potential costs of full-blown default, the amounts that Germany and other countries are likely to put into the three bail-out packages look like excellent value (...). The rescuers need not be quite so sanctimonious.

Adam Smith vs the mercantile class

The last post reminded me of an obligatory Adam Smith quote (if you want to rebuke the faux free market advocates - who think free markets are good for us little people but not for the rich - I know of no saner and more incisive helper than Mr. Smith, who loved the markets but knew their failings well):

In reality high profits tend much more to raise the price of
work than high wages.(...)

Our merchants and master-manufacturers complain much of
the bad effects of high wages in raising the price, and thereby
lessening the sale of their goods both at home and abroad. They say
nothing concerning the bad effects of high profits. They are silent
with regard to the pernicious effects of their own gains. They
complain only of those of other people.

-Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations (chapter IX, last paragraph)

A rising tide lifts all yachts

Prosperity in Germany means only prosperity for the owners of capital:

German Workers Might Get Pay Increases, Call In the Central Bank!

Saturday, 30 April 2011 08:31

The NYT reports that the low unemployment rate in Germany might allow workers to get higher wages, which could put upward pressure on the inflation rate. The only sources cited in this story are Jean-Calude Trichet, the head of the European Central Bank, Rainer Brüderle, the Economics minister for the conservative German government, and Jörg Krämer, the chief economist at Commerzbank in Frankfurt. It would have been useful to include the views of someone who believes that German workers should see pay increases. Real wages in Germany have barely risen over the course of the last decade, even as productivity has grown by close to 2 percent a year. This has led to a shift from wages to profits. It has also meant that German labor costs have fallen relative to labor costs of the countries like Greece, Portugal, and Spain. The only way that trade between Germany and these countries can become more balanced (as long as they remain in the euro) is by having some combination of higher labor costs in Germany and lower labor costs in the peripheral countries. For this reason, higher wages for German workers would not just be beneficial to these workers, it would also be an important part of the re-balancing needed within the euro zone. It is remarkable that this obvious point is never mentioned in this article. It is also worth noting that this article uses misleading unemployment data. It gives readers the official German unemployment rate of 7.1 percent. This measure counts part-time workers as unemployed. TheOECD measure, which uses a similar methodology to the United States, shows that Germany has an unemployment rate of 6.3 percent. There is no excuse for not using the OECD measure since it is readily available and provides readers with a more accurate assessment of Germany's labor market situation. -from cepr.net

very small things

(...)
                                 In a folded
spear of the Bird of Paradise lily,
two snails are mating. They began
yesterday and after twenty hours’
foreplay are still at it, inserting mutual
penises into mutual vaginas. ‘In times
dedicated to universality and excess’,
I have ‘never been so interested
in very small things – twinkling tadpoles
in a barrel of water, the germination
of a fungus, ants nibbling at the leaves
of a lemon tree and leaving it like lace.
(...)

- Landeg White, in Letters from Portugal (to appear)

Julia

I always thought Julia was the really smart one, in Orwell's 1984:


" I don't imagine that we can alter anything in our own lifetime. But one can imagine little knots of resistance springing up here and there -- small groups of people banding themselves together, and gradually growing, and even leaving a few records behind, so that the next generations can carry on where we leave off.' 

'I'm not interested in the next generation, dear. I'm interested in us.' 

'You're only a rebel from the waist downwards,' he told her. 

She thought this brilliantly witty and flung her arms round him in delight. 

In the ramifications of party doctrine she had not the faintest interest. Whenever he began to talk of the principles of Ingsoc, doublethink, the mutability of the past, and the denial of objective reality, and to use Newspeak words, she became bored and confused and said that she never paid any attention to that kind of thing. One knew that it was all rubbish, so why let oneself be worried by it? She knew when to cheer and when to boo, and that was all one needed. If he persisted in talking of such subjects, she had a disconcerting habit of falling asleep. She was one of those people who can go to sleep at any hour and in any position. Talking to her, he realized how easy it was to present an appearance of orthodoxy while having no grasp whatever of what orthodoxy meant. In a way, the world-view of the Party imposed itself most successfully on people incapable of understanding it. They could be made to accept the most flagrant violations of reality, because they never fully grasped the enormity of what was demanded of them, and were not sufficiently interested in public events to notice what was happening. By lack of understanding they remained sane. They simply swallowed everything, and what they swallowed did them no harm, because it left no residue behind, just as a grain of corn will pass undigested through the body of a bird."

What a beautiful new world to look up to

For chinese men, no house mean no luv

The takeover goes on

In financial crisis, no prosecutions of top figures (NYT)

Would we allow goldman sachs to fail now? (baselinescenario) (spoiler: the answer is no (of course))

I love to say I told you so, F., so here it is: "I told you so". I told you we should have let them all fall and you said I was irresponsible. I said at least we had to punish them right there and then and you said there was no time, we'd to it later; you said after this it would never be the same; it would have to change; they would have to accept changes. Well, here we are.

Years later, no punishment, no regulation,  failed banks and failed rating agencies preaching over the states who bailed them, and all of us on the road to servitude under the new corporate feudalism. And still the sheep bleat and flog both each other and their own backs and join in the cries of the austerics, like in some catholic orgy of self-flagelation.  Is it some judeo-cretin fetish again, maybe that's why I don't get it? Why aren't you shouting "off with their heads?" Why aren't they cowering in fear? Why aren't you singing "you got the guns but we've got the numbers?". Instead you cower in fear. Are you now discovering what being poor is? It is not about having no money. You still have money, but already you are poor. It is about living in fear. Every single day. It is about going to sleep hoping you won't get sick, because if everything goes right you might just make it, but if you wake up sick, expensively sick, then you are ruined forever - there in the gutter, but for the sake of luck, you go.

Why aren't you at least politely correcting them when they say "the state failed"? The state failed? Yes, it failed, when it bailed them out. But they who speak of the markets, the markets have spoken and they all failed, from the dirtiest Madoff right up to sage Warren Buffet, they all failed. They are broke. They are only standing up, the financially undead, because they bought the politicians and stole our money and our futures. And we let them. Because we won't go out on the streets and bring the whole fucking thing down. Because we won't burn their golf courses and serve them molotov cocktails. Because we have grown too polite. We have been bred to cower in front of the new aristocracy, to feed on their narrative, to think in their terms. And to admire their ugly mugs in the covers of magazines. The pigs have taken over the farm.

Large corporations are in effect states, and by their nature the worst kind of states: private realms and absolute tyrannies. The employer's rule is arbitrary, he controls what you dress, he controls every waking hour, and what the waking hours are, he controls your speech. Oh, you can leave. Leave and beg your meal from another just as bad, or perish, since the the social state is about to be eliminated. Your tax money is not there for you, you parasite! It is there to bail  out your betters when they fuck up again.

Communism fails because it degenerates into an opressive bureaucracy. Capitalism fails because it degenerates into corporate feudalism. Both are unstable systems, vigilance is necessary, and a periodical reboot must be executed, at great human expense. Jefferson was wise, or at least, right.

It is a brilliant takeover. We have freedom of speech - in the public sphere. We have the right to vote - in the public sphere. We have lots of rights - in the public sphere. Nobody would dare take those rights away openly. But the public sphere is reduced to a mere pebble, and in the private sphere - that occupies the whole world where you can dwell, feed, survive - it is back to middle age autocracy. Welcome back to the age of the robber barons. Welcome back to the age where I wonder if I should say such things in the future, without wearing a mask.

As I was writing this the sheep were shouting over some idiotic football match. The whole street trembled in joy because some obscenely overpayed athlete stuck a ball into a goal. If only these people could be made to shout half as hard over the fact they and their children are being gutted, the day could still be won.

Plus ça change...

"(...) when war comes they [The Government] are both unwilling and unable to increase their revenue in proportion to the increase of their expence. They are unwilling for fear of offending the people, who, by so great and so sudden an increase of taxes, would soon be disgusted with the war; and they are unable from not well knowing what taxes would be sufficient to produce the revenue wanted. The facility of borrowing delivers them from the embarrassment which this fear and inability would otherwise occasion. By means of borrowing they are enabled, with a very moderate increase of taxes, to raise, from year to year, money sufficient for carrying on the war, and by the practice of perpetually funding they are enabled, with the smallest possible increase of taxes, to raise annually the largest possible sum of money. In great empires the people who live in the capital, and in the provinces remote from the scene of action, feel, many of them, scarce any inconveniency from the war; but enjoy, at their ease, the amusement of reading in the newspapers the exploits of their own fleets and armies. To them this amusement compensates the small difference between the taxes which they pay on account of the war, and those which they had been accustomed to pay in time of peace. They are commonly dissatisfied with the return of peace, which puts an end to their amusement, and to a thousand visionary hopes of conquest and national glory from a longer continuance of the war."

-Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations

Noblesse Oblige

Of course we had to go into Lybia, young man! Have you no human compassion? What choice did we have, with civilian lives at stake? Mere consistency demanded so! Did we not rush headlong into Tian'anmen square? Did we not rescue Tibet? Did we not sanction and isolate China? Consistency, boy, and compassion, and Democracy, and, why, civilization! It is the white man's burden, after all!
Conditions apply: recipient of military help must have oil or other strategic interest; balance of forces must be extremely favorable, conflict must lead to inventory cycling and profits increase for miltary industrial complex.

Euro Doublespeak

"(...)In essence (...) it is the taxpayers of Greece, Ireland and Portugal who are bailing out German, French and British taxpayers and depositors — not the other way around. The indebted countries are not really getting bailouts, he said, “but loans at high interest rates.” For there to be a real bailout, he said, there would have to be a default.(...)"
-New York Times link

This (...) is the price populations are now being asked to pay for the EU's refusal to heap any economic pain onto the banks that lent these countries money. The alternative to shutting down schools, emergency wards, slashing pension rights etc would be to impose a penalty on those who lent the money in the form of a so-called "haircut".

Paradoxically this is exactly what the EU's proposed future grand bargain involves:(...) any banks that lend to countries that show themselves in danger of going bust would be deemed "irresponsible lenders" and penalized by not getting all their money back. (...)

So why don't they simply apply this market logic in retrospect and impose losses on the banks now?

Here we come to the naked struggle between countries and between interest groups. The banks that irresponsibly lent so much money to peripheral Europe are mainly in, er, northern Europe. France, Germany and Britain would be hammered if their banks were forced to take losses now on the stricken sovereign debts of the periphery.

So the essential deal involved in the new "stability and growth" (don't you just love Euro doublespeak?) arrangements would be: poor countries must pay through austerity so that rich countries do not go through a banking crisis.

-Paul Mason, BBC link

Mértola

Last year, me and a few friends went south to Mértola (Amendoeira da serra, to be more precise) and had some adventures, rummaging for sheep skulls, chasing black pigs (embarrasingly mistaken for boars) and generally sketching till we dropped.

Good times.

Nursery Rhyme Redux: Evolution made us all

Evolution Made Us All from Ben Hillman on Vimeo.


A great nursery rhyme to teach your brats: Evolution made us all ( from mother Theresa to the lamprey eel). Bin Laden and Che Guevara make guest appearences.

Urban Sketchers - exposição / Urban Sketchers collective exhibition

Em Setembro os urban sketchers foram em peso desenhar a Rua Augusta. Agora, de 2 a 18 de Fevereiro, os desenhos estão em exposição na Fac. de Belas Artes. Eu tenho lá um dos meus, também: este.

Last September the urban sketchers went out en masse to draw Rua (street) Augusta. A sample of our drawings will be on display at the Faculdade de Belas Artes in Lisbon, from February 2nd to February 18th.
I have one drawing there, namely this one.

Visual Illusion - "Silencing"

From Harvard Vision Lab, a new type of visual illusion that shows we are apparently very bad at noticing changes in a moving object. If, like me, you are too busy to read the paper just check out the amazing videos at the vision labs page and prepare never to trust your two lying eyes again (in the example below, the colors are still changing at the same rate when the object moves - but you can't see it, can you?).


Motion silences awareness of color changes from Jordan Suchow on Vimeo.

Back to plundering as usual?

From the NYT:

"This week, figures from a private research group, Income Data Services, showed that while pay raises for ordinary workers in 2010 had been about 2 percent — much less than the rate of inflation — average remuneration for chief executives at the country’s top 100 companies soared a staggering 55 percent. Many Britons are expecting the country’s bankers to award themselves billion of pounds in bonuses.

And while the squeezed middle is squeezed further, the columnist Simon Jenkins wrote in The Guardian, “the bankers have walked from the debacle scot free, with almost a trillion pounds of public money in their pockets.”

“As long as the government continues to tolerate this gross imbalance of pain,” Mr. Jenkins wrote, “people will howl, and they will be right.”"

And in the report issued by the IDS:

"IDS warn that and “the business as usual” approach of FTSE remuneration committees after 

such a short period of restraint risks upsetting shareholders.

Steve Tatton, editor of the IDS Directors Pay Report comments: “It seems the days of earnings 

restraint by FTSE-350 directors were short-lived. It is as though the recession never happened.”

“It stands in stark contrast to the coalition Government’s concerns about pay fairness and calls 

for senior executives in the public sector to accept pay cuts.”

IDS says that while some chief executives may argue that their pay was a result of rising share 

prices and improved company performance, shareholders are likely to ask whether the business 

improvement over the period warrants the scale of the increases.

While the FTSE-100 rose 14.5% on the year, bonuses were up by over a third, share option gains 

by over 90% and LTIPs by over 70%.

Despite the increasing scrutiny of shareholders, FTSE-100 chief executives received bonus 

payments averaging £701,512, up 34% from last year (based on a matched sample).

Steve Tatton comments: “The size of the rebound in incentives for top company bosses poses 

some questions for remuneration committees about the design of their incentives.”

“This time last year a number of companies actually reduced their bonus ceilings. Twelve months 

later it appears as if these measures have been reversed, with around 40 companies reporting 

higher bonus scheme maxima.”"